Case Study

    Saver Fare Experience

    Comprehensive UX research uncovering how travelers understand fare restrictions, shaping Alaska Airlines' future booking strategy

    Role:User Experience ResearcherPlatform:Alaska Airlines Web + MobileFocus:Fare comprehension + booking confidenceScope:Discovery → testing → recommendations
    Alaska Airlines Saver Fare Experience Research

    Key Contributions

    • Led mixed-methods research across 60+ participants over 10 weeks.

    • Designed and moderated remote usability testing for desktop and mobile flows.

    • Synthesized qualitative data into actionable themes through affinity mapping.

    • Translated research findings into strategic design recommendations.

    • Informed Alaska Airlines' approach to transparent pricing and fare clarity.

    At a glance

    Problem

    Travelers didn't fully understand Saver Fare restrictions, leading to confusion, frustration, and abandoned bookings.

    Outcome

    Research-driven recommendations that shaped Alaska Airlines' approach to fare transparency and booking confidence.

    What I owned

    Research design, participant recruitment, moderated testing, synthesis, and strategic recommendations.

    Constraints

    Competitive positioning pressure, existing booking flow architecture, mobile-first audience.

    As competition grew in the unbundled fare market, Alaska Airlines needed to understand how customers perceived restricted fare types and identify opportunities to improve fare transparency.

    The challenge

    Understanding the research problem

    Many travelers didn't fully understand Saver Fare's restrictions during early testing, leading to confusion and frustration. Our goal was to identify the root causes of this misunderstanding through in-depth user research.

    Confusing fare comparison

    Travelers struggled to understand practical differences between fare types.

    Hidden restrictions

    Key limitations weren't obvious until later in the booking flow.

    Abandoned bookings

    Confusion led to cart abandonment in testing, increasing potential for support calls.

    Unclear value

    Customers couldn't assess if lower price justified restrictions.

    Research approach

    Mixed-methods study

    Our study combined usability testing and foundational research to reveal mental models, pain points, and design opportunities around fare comprehension.

    01

    Recruitment & Screening60+ participants across 10 weeks.

    02

    Remote Moderated TestingDesktop and mobile booking flows.

    03

    Qualitative InterviewsIn-depth fare comprehension questions.

    04

    Synthesis & Affinity MappingThemes across confusion and trust.

    Desktop: Saver-to-Choice flow

    Mobile: Fare comprehension testing

    Key findings

    What we discovered

    Through iterative testing and synthesis, four critical themes emerged that shaped our understanding of fare comprehension and booking confidence.

    Non-combinability message caused friction

    Lack of disclosure regarding fare selections created confusion.

    "I didn't realize I couldn't book different fare types."

    Participant feedback

    Non-combinability message caused friction

    Upsell modal increased comprehension

    Travelers understood fare differences better when guided through contextual comparisons.

    "Now I can actually see what I'm getting with each option."

    Participant feedback

    Upsell modal increased comprehension

    Seat map lacked legend clarity

    Travelers couldn't differentiate between paid and included seats.

    "Which seats can I actually choose from?"

    Participant feedback

    Seat map lacked legend clarity

    Reminder screens reinforced restrictions

    Fare rule recaps before checkout increased trust.

    "Good to see this reminder before I complete my purchase."

    Participant feedback

    Reminder screens reinforced restrictions

    Recommendations

    From insights to action

    Research findings translated into actionable recommendations that guided Alaska Airlines' UX and digital experience teams toward improved fare clarity and booking confidence.

    Enhanced fare comparison

    Side-by-side visual comparison with clear savings callouts and restriction summaries.

    Expected impact: Improved comprehension of value proposition.

    Progressive information display

    Primary details upfront with expandable sections for comprehensive fare rules.

    Expected impact: Reduced cognitive load while maintaining transparency.

    Mobile-first optimization

    Vertical layout with thumb-friendly targets and sticky selection controls.

    Expected impact: Seamless mobile booking experience.

    Transparent pricing

    Clear communication of restrictions with contextual warnings and confirmations.

    Expected impact: Increased trust and reduced support calls.

    Decisions and tradeoffs

    What we chose, and what we left behind

    Every shipped surface is one choice among several. These were the calls that shaped the work.

    Considered

    Disclosing Saver Fare restrictions deep in the booking flow at payment.

    Chose

    Disclosing restrictions at fare selection, before any commitment was made.

    Why

    Hidden restrictions drove the strongest negative sentiment in research. Moving disclosure forward traded short-term conversion concern for long-term trust.

    Considered

    A toggle to compare Saver against Main fare on demand.

    Chose

    An always-visible side-by-side comparison at the decision point.

    Why

    Users skipped optional comparison and then felt misled. Making the comparison default removed the regret loop without adding clutter.

    Considered

    Upsell to Main fare as a banner above the fare grid.

    Chose

    Upsell as a contextual prompt only when the user's selection conflicted with their stated trip needs.

    Why

    Persistent upsell read as pressure. Conditional upsell read as guidance and converted better in testing.

    Impact

    Measurable outcomes

    The research shaped Alaska Airlines' approach to transparent pricing across booking, marketing, and customer education.

    18%

    Potential increase in Saver Fare bookings

    Improved fare clarity and transparent pricing led to higher booking confidence in testing.

    Reduction in confusion

    Customers reported significantly better understanding of fare differences and restrictions.

    Decrease in support calls

    Clearer communication reduced the need for post-booking support and inquiries.

    Looking ahead

    What I'd do next

    Lessons learned

    • Transparency builds trust. Customers preferred seeing restrictions upfront.

    • Progressive disclosure works. Primary info visible, details on demand.

    • Mobile-first is essential. Majority of bookings happened on mobile.

    Future directions

    • Accessible pricing visualization for users with visual impairments.

    • Integration with loyalty program benefits to enhance perceived value.

    This research proved that clarity is a competitive advantage. When travelers understand what they're getting, they book with confidence. Research-driven UX strategy builds trust and loyalty.

    Explore more work

    People Skills
    AI UX Design

    People Skills

    Led the design for People Skills, an innovative feature enhancing discoverability and adoption across Microsoft 365, Copilot, and Viva platforms.

    Virtual Appointments
    Enterprise Design

    Virtual Appointments

    Designed a seamless booking and lobby chat experience for Microsoft Teams, enhancing the scheduling and pre-meeting interaction workflows.

    Albertsons Pilot App
    Mobile Design

    Albertsons Pilot App

    Designed a pilot mobile application to help Albertsons customers make healthier food choices through personalized recommendations and actionable insights.